Franco Agamenone vs Abedallah Shelbayh Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Strength: Agamenone has a slight edge with a 45.21% success rate on second serves, compared to Shelbayh's 42.69%. Could this offer him an upper hand?
• Return Game Analysis: Shelbayh has a stronger return game, capturing 49.36% of opponent's second serves versus Agamenone's 47.02%.
• First Serve Return Comparison: Agamenone returns 29.96% of first serves, outperforming Shelbayh's 27.85%.
• Handling Pressure: Shelbayh surpasses Agamenone slightly in breakpoint savings, at 52.58% to Agamenone's 51.22%.
• Performance Over the Year: Agamenone has won 55% of his matches, shading Shelbayh’s 47.62% win rate.
• Surface Proficiency: Both players perform best on hard courts, but Shelbayh slightly outperforms with a 63% win rate, compared to Agamenone’s 59%.
• Event Level Performance: They have nearly identical win rates in Challengers/ITF tournaments, with Shelbayh at 49.12% and Agamenone at 48.48%.
• Direct Encounters: The head-to-head record is tied at 1-1, with an even set record of 2-2.
• Pressure Situations: Agamenone is better under pressure, having won the only tiebreaker between them.
• Opponent Quality: Shelbayh has faced tougher opponents, with an average rank of 316.41, compared to Agamenone's 369.42.
• Deciding Set Performance: Agamenone fares better with a 61% success rate in deciding sets, whereas Shelbayh has a 48% win rate.
• Break Point Conversion: Shelbayh slightly edges out in breakpoint conversions at 35.59%, versus Agamenone's 35.56%.

Editorial Prediction (May 20, 2025, UTC):

Assessing their recent performances, both players display particular strengths. Agamenone's slightly stronger second serve gives him an initial edge, yet Shelbayh's return game, especially against second serves, may negate this advantage.

Agamenone demonstrates a consistently higher win rate over the past year, hinting at a potentially stronger mental game, particularly in deciding sets where Shelbayh has fallen short.

Interestingly, both have shown similar success rates on hard courts, which makes this a focal point for the match. With a history of close games and matching head-to-head records, it could be closely contested.

Ultimately, given Agamenone's ability to perform under pressure and better results in deciding sets, he is projected as the likely winner in their upcoming encounter.